[2.32] If an arbitration agreement is entered into by a party that is unable to do so, the provisions of the New York Convention (or, if applicable, the Model Act) may come into force at the beginning or end of the arbitration. First, the applicant asks the competent court to terminate the arbitration procedure on the basis of annulment, inefficiency or disability.46 At the end of the arbitration procedure, the applicant asks the competent court to refuse recognition and execution of the award on the basis that, according to the applicable law, one of the parties to the arbitration agreement is “under a certain incapacity.” The parties can agree on the time frame within which the arbitration award is to be awarded. This agreement must be written down. In the absence of an agreement, arbitrators must issue an arbitration award within 30 days of the closing of the hearings or, if the hearings have been abandoned, within 30 days of the formal closing of the proceedings, instead of oral hearings. Parties may also agree to extend this period. [2.20] Thus, for the purposes of Option 1 of the Model Act, the letter can now be completed if the content of the arbitration agreement is covered “in any form.” In the relationship between the employer and the worker, Swedish jurisprudence states that the employer has the right to include a compromise clause in an employment contract only if such an arbitration clause also requires the employer to pay the arbitrators` fees, regardless of the outcome. The negative effect is the judge`s obligation to bring any action in relation to an object of the arbitration agreement, On the other hand, the positive effect is the possibility for the applicant to initiate arbitration proceedings directly against the defendant without the need for judicial intervention, as long as the arbitration agreement is complete.4 The infirm proceedings, as provided for by the UNCITRAL model law, cannot be quashed by an appeal or by appeal to the courts. [2.26] Thus Kaverit, in Kaverit Steel Crane Ltd/Kone Corporation39, commenced legal proceedings in which kone had violated certain licensing and distribution agreements. Kone requested a stay and a reference to arbitration in accordance with the compromise clause contained in the agreements.
The clause stipulated that all disputes “arising or related to this contract” would be referred to arbitration proceedings. Alberta Queen`s Bench dismissed the stay on the grounds that some of Kaverit`s allegations contained allegations that went beyond the offences, such as conspiracy and offence. The Tribunal found that these claims based on unlawful facts did not fall within the scope of the compromise clause. Russia clearly understands that arbitration is a separate apparatus from the state judicial system, as it results from the parties` decision to submit their disputes to a private dispute resolution mechanism. In Russia, however, arbitration should not be confused with the “arbitrazh” courts. From the tradition that stems from the Soviet era, state courts dealing with commercial disputes are called “arbitrazh courts.” Arbitrazh courts fall into the judicial system of the state and have little to do with arbitration, except to be allowed to be sidelined or recognize and impose arbitral awards. Despite the fact that “Schieds” and “Arbitrazh” bear a phonetic resemblance to each other, you are two separate and independent dispute resolution systems. In practice, an arbitral tribunal is often referred to as “southern treteyskiy,” which means a private mechanism for self-regulation of dispute resolution. Sweden – EN There are no formal conditions for an arbitration agreement in Sweden, but a written arbitration agreement is of course preferred for obvious reasons.