That is why John decides to settle his debt obligation with a new one by proposing to Peter and Mary a novation agreement. The parties agreed to conclude the contract by signing the Novation Agreement, in which Mary assumes John`s obligations to Peter, and she will now be obliged to fulfill all the obligations that Jean-Pierre owed. The innovation agreement can be used to renegotiate the repayment plan, provided the parties agree on the new terms. The criteria for the new debtor include the acceptance of the new debtor, the acceptance of liability by the new debtor and the acceptance of the new contract by the former debtor as the full performance of the old contract. Novation is not a unilateral contractual mechanism, which, in the new circumstances, gives way to negotiations on the new GGV. Thus, “the adoption of the new treaty as a full execution of the old contract” can be read in conjunction with the phenomenon of “mutual consent of the CGV”.  Unlike an order that is universal as long as the other party is terminated (unless the obligation is specific to the debtor, as in a personal service contract with a particular ballet dancer, or if the assignment would involve a new and particular burden for the counterparty), an innovation is valid only with the agreement of all parties to the original agreement.  A contract transferred through the innovation procedure transfers all obligations and obligations from the original debtor to the new debtor. There are some similarities between a replacement contract and a novelty, the most important being that they both involve a change in the partnership. However, the nature of this modification of a replacement contract is in the contract itself, while the change in innovation rests with the parties involved. In addition, novation is a consensual transfer of rights and obligations that requires all contracting parties to agree and sign the agreement.
On the contrary, the surrender does not require the approval of the new party. Replacement contracts are not equivalent contracts, as innovation assumes that a third party who was not part of the original contract is involved. In innovation scenarios, the contract is issued without delay if the third party is accepted by the subject. Replacement contracts immediately lighten the previous contract and merge into the new contract. The result is an effect that renders the original contract unenforceable, unless there is a specific agreement that says something else. A replacement contract occurs when two or more parties participate in a joint venture and find that the current agreement is no longer relevant or effective.